Several Six Flags parks recently unveiled new guidelines aimed at content creators, which have sparked both controversy and approval. These guidelines, noted first by ParkFans.net, a site known for breaking news on attractions like those at Kings Dominion, have drawn criticism for what some perceive as stringent restrictions on information sharing.
ParkFans.net tweeted their concerns, highlighting issues such as restrictions on sharing construction photos, public records coverage, and any negative commentary about Six Flags properties. This has led to skepticism about the reliability of information from media outlets included in Six Flags’ media lists.
Legacy media figures also weighed in, with Steve Norris mocking the guidelines on Twitter, emphasizing the perceived bias towards positive coverage. The guidelines, which have been implemented across parks that were once part of Cedar Fair and are now under Six Flags after a recent merger, aim to regulate how creators interact with park information.
Defenders of the guidelines, such as @ExpAttractions, supported the restrictions on revealing insider information without park approval, arguing that even publicly available data should be handled with caution to maintain access to media lists.
Theme Park Tribune sought clarification on these guidelines, questioning whether they could prevent media access for outlets reporting on public documents or visible construction. Courtney McGarry Weber, Carowinds’ director of communications, clarified that these rules apply specifically to content creators, not traditional media. Weber underscored the distinction, suggesting that media credentials play a role in determining who falls under which guidelines.
However, concerns persist regarding potential repercussions for sharing information about upcoming attractions similar to traditional news reporting. Weber emphasized that different Six Flags parks might interpret the guidelines differently, hinting at potential variance in enforcement.
In an emailed statement, Weber emphasized that the guidelines aim to foster a positive community and set clear expectations for those wishing to collaborate with Six Flags parks. She reiterated that these rules are designed for content creators seeking to visit the park and participate in media events.
The history of former Cedar Fair parks suggests that decisions on media access can hinge on the tone of coverage. For instance, the Sandusky Register faced access restrictions after critical reporting on Cedar Point, including coverage of accidents and internal issues, and opposition to the merger with Six Flags.
Overall, the introduction of these guidelines reflects Six Flags’ efforts to manage its public image amidst media scrutiny and regulatory changes, underscoring the evolving dynamics between theme parks and digital content creators in today’s media landscape.
